<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>The Puget News &#187; Bruce Sterling</title>
	<atom:link href="http://thepugetnews.com/tag/bruce-sterling/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://thepugetnews.com</link>
	<description>Covering creativity in the Pacific Northwest and beyond.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 13 Jan 2012 05:58:50 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Bruce Sterling&#8217;s &#8220;Eighteen Challenges in Contemporary Literature&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://thepugetnews.com/2009/06/04/bruce-sterlings-eighteen-challenges-in-contemporary-literature/</link>
		<comments>http://thepugetnews.com/2009/06/04/bruce-sterlings-eighteen-challenges-in-contemporary-literature/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Jun 2009 18:06:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Eric Franklin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[arts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[web]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Books]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bruce Sterling]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thepugetnews.com/?p=873</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Wired Magazine has a list of &#8220;Eighteen Challenges in Contemporary Fiction&#8221; which is worth a perusal. The ones that resonate the most with me right now are these: 5. Ink-on-paper manufacturing is an outmoded, toxic industry with steeply rising costs. 8. Long tail balkanizes audiences, disrupts means of canon-building and fragments literary reputation. 17. Polarizing [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p><p>Wired Magazine has a list of &#8220;<a href="http://www.wired.com/beyond_the_beyond/2009/05/eighteen-challenges-in-contemporary-literature/">Eighteen Challenges in Contemporary Fiction</a>&#8221; which is worth a perusal. The ones that resonate the most with me right now are these:</p>
<blockquote><ul>
<li>5. Ink-on-paper manufacturing is an outmoded, toxic industry with steeply rising costs.</li>
<li>8. Long tail balkanizes audiences, disrupts means of canon-building and fragments literary reputation.</li>
<li>17. Polarizing civil cold war is harmful to intellectual honesty.</li>
</ul>
</blockquote>
<p>#5 resonates with me since I just moved form a large house to a tiny condo and had to move my book collection &#8211; again. I have hundreds of pounds of books stored in many bookshelves, even after trimming the collection by about 50% in a recent moving sale. I read the other day that <a href="http://www.oregonlive.com/books/index.ssf/2009/06/amazons_jeff_bezos_with_a.html">Sherman Alexie considers the Kindle to be an &#8220;elitist&#8221; device</a> &#8211; because Kindle is expensive and only driven by one company. While I understand where he&#8217;s coming from and agree that it is currently elitist, I also think it neglects the fact that people with large libraries of physical books are also &#8220;elitist&#8221; but also &#8220;environmentally non-friendly.&#8221; I love books, but I also think that books are a luxury that should not be afforded by people who read a lot and can afford to get a device that doesn&#8217;t perpetuate the shipping of dead trees and the expansion of personal space to maintain a collection of knowledge.</p>
<p>#8 is just plain interesting. As a literature student, I love the ability to locate nearly any reading material via Amazon.com. The fact that the long-tail is now available to researchers and academics is a boon to society and literary study. Unfortunately, it is also true that the availability of the long-tail has indeed &#8220;balkanized&#8221; more casual readers. It&#8217;s important for cultural reading experiences to exist, for mass market works that matter to be read by large percentages of a population as it further discourse and allows for common language to be achieved. I am particularly interested in group readings of major works. In fact, this is one reason I&#8217;ve been so active in reading groups throughout the years and am partaking in <a href="http://www.infinitesummer.org/">Infinite Summer</a>. (We&#8217;ve got a small reading group that will most likely be meeting a couple times a week on Wednesday evenings in Seattle. If you want to join us, feel free to leave your comment so I can get in touch with you. You&#8217;ll be doing your part to combat excess balkanization.)</p>
<p>#17. That just the result of non-face-to-face discourse in the internet age. A small percentage of vocal self-serving twits can exert undue influence over debate. It&#8217;s a core problem that needs to be addressed. I don&#8217;t know what to do about it.</p>
<p>The entire list is thought-provoking and worth a read. Which one resonates most with you and why?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://thepugetnews.com/2009/06/04/bruce-sterlings-eighteen-challenges-in-contemporary-literature/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

