Thomas Pynchon’s new novel takes a beating in the New York Times
Posted in Books on November 20th, 2006 by Eric FranklinMichiko Kikutani, lead literary critic for the New York Times, has focused her criticism on the new Thomas Pynchon novel, “Against the Day” today:
Thomas Pynchon’s new novel, “Against the Day,” reads like the sort of imitation of a Thomas Pynchon novel that a dogged but ungainly fan of this author’s might have written on quaaludes. It is a humongous, bloated jigsaw puzzle of a story, pretentious without being provocative, elliptical without being illuminating, complicated without being rewardingly complex.
For anyone familiar with Michiko Kakutani, you’ll know that her negative reviews are how where she has made her reputation. In fact, she parlayed her punditry into a Pulitzer back in 1998. The Pulitzer committee mentioned her “fearless and authoritative” judgments.
I do find her fearless and generally accurate in her criticism, but I also believe she polarizes and sensationalizes - both to the detriment of her reading audience. Her arguments take little of the structure of balanced argument. Instead, she picks “thumbs up” or “thumbs down” and then proceeds to create an argument in that direction while glossing counter-argument. I have no doubt that she is correct that this work by Pynchon may indeed be overwrought and not his best work, but then again,who would suggest that “Crying of Lot 49,” “Mason and Dixon,” and “Gravity’s Rainbow” isn’t a fairly tall order? While Kakutani writes well and tends to make some interesting points, her polarization might as well be a “hot or not” gossip column for the literary world: “Oh my God, have you seen Thomas Pynchon’s new bloated monstrosity? Uh-uh girlfriend, not gonna cut it.”
Read the rest of this entry »